Application for review of judgement No. 333 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal =
Read Online
Share

Application for review of judgement No. 333 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal = Demand deréformation du judgement No. 333 du Tribunal Administratif des Nations Unies. by International Court of Justice.

  • 681 Want to read
  • ·
  • 56 Currently reading

Published by Internation Court of Justice in The Hague .
Written in English


Book details:

Edition Notes

Text mainly in English.

SeriesPleadings, oral arguments, documents = -- Mémoires, plaidoiries et documents, Pleadings, oral arguments, documents
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL21114984M
ISBN 100119099586

Download Application for review of judgement No. 333 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal =

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Frequently Asked Questions. Can I bring a case for execution of judgement directly to the Tribunal? No. In accordance with current jurisprudence, the Tribunal is of the view that the Respondent’s failure to implement an order is a new administrative decision which must be the subject matter of a. United Nations Administrative Tribunal. As a result of the decision of the General Assembly to establish a new system of administration of justice, including a two-tier formal system comprising a first instance, the UN Dispute Tribunal, and an appellate instance, the UN Appeals Tribunal, the UN Administrative Tribunal was abolished as of 31 December (See resolutions 61/ of 4 April. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal / International Court of Justice = Demande de reformation du jugement no. du Tribunal administratif des Nations Unies / Cour internationale de justice I.C.J. ; Sales Section, United Nations [distributor [Hague, Netherlands]: New York, NY, USA The Judgement of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Judgement No. ) which was the subject of the application to the Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements resulting in the present request for advisory opinion was given on 15 May in case No. , Mortished v. the Secretary-General of the.

"The Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements has decided that there is a substantial basis within the meaning of Article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal for the application for the review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement No. , delivered at . See pending cases. Jadhav (India v. Pakistan) Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) Application for revision of the Judgment of 23 May in the case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks. Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal: United Nations Administrative Tribunal: 10 September 27 May Opinion on Merits Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) Nicaragua Costa Rica: 28 July 19 August Discontinued WHY THE UN NEEDS AN INTERNAL SYSTEM OF JUSTICE. Work-related disputes at the United Nations cannot be resolved through national courts due to .

Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, I.C.J. 18 (Advisory Opinion of May 27) (in which a USSR national who, after his resignation from Soviet government service and a request for asylum in the United States, was denied continued U.N. employment). Author: Jose E. Alvarez. ISBN: OCLC Number: Description: xxi, pages: map ; 25 cm: Contents: An Overview of the Work of the World Court () The Year --The Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice --Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal / John King Gamble Document search. Members of the Court. Current Members. Statements by the President. Chambers and Committees. Current Judges ad hoc. All Judges ad hoc. How the Court Works. Financial Assistance to Parties. Organizational Chart of the Registry. Texts governing the Registry. Library of the Court. Current vacancies. Judicial Fellows Programme. Summaries of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice 2 (c) with regard to Question IX, Unanimously, That the decision given by the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization in its Judgment No. is valid.”.